Shakers

Using laboratory shakers in CO2 incubators has become a standard in many labs. However, for a successful outcome there are a couple of key factors that everyone should be aware of.

Monoclonal antibodies have been used for testing kits and medical therapies across a wide range of applications. The most recent is to provide a potential treatment for patients suffering from Covid-19 infection. The production of monoclonal antibodies is well understood, scalable and standardized to the extent that it makes a good generic example of a modern bioprocess. This aspect will be the focus of this short overview. 

Buying a new incubator shaker may seem like a simple job. You could select the same model again, the cheapest version, or the shaker with the fastest delivery time. Nothing to worry about as it’s a simple standard product, so anything will do the job. However, this approach leaves out a vital factor – what quality of results can you expect at the other end of your bioprocess? 

The shake flask is one of the standard laboratory tools for culture of microorganisms and cells. The bioreactor, conversely, is seen as a specialized, solution for commercial applications and academic departments such as chemical engineering. While there is a generic case to be made for this view, the realities of modern research in the biosciences have expanded the need for more information and semi-production capability at small scales.

Humidification systems are vital for sucessful small-volume and long-lasting cultivations in the incubator shaker (e.g. screening in microtiter plates or cell culture). The different systems available on the market have one primary focus: to reduce evaporation losses by increasing the humidity levels inside the incubation chamber. However, there are significant differences in terms of quality, humidity control and sterility. This blog post highlights the Pros and Cons of the 3 most commonly used humidification systems.