The Difference Between Batch, Fed-batch and Continuous Processes

Supply of a substrate is a must for any bioprocess, even if it is just mineral salts, light and CO2 for algae. Usually, it is in the form of a sugar, which is either provided just at the start of a process or added over time. The choice of which method to use will depend on the organism, application and final goal.

 

The main choices are:

  • Batch, where no extra feeding is used from beginning to end of the process
  • Fed-batch, where feeding with substrate and supplements can extend the duration of culture for higher cell densities or switch metabolism to produce e.g. a recombinant protein
  • Continuous culture, where either the feed rate of a growth-limiting substance keeps cell density constant (a chemostat) or cell density determines the feed rate of the substrate (turbidostat). Cell retention can offer another, very productive option (perfusion). The incoming feed rate matches the rate of removal of harvest. The balanced nature of the feeding allows a steady state to be achieved which can last for days to months. This state is good for studying microbial metabolism or long-term production.
  • Repeated Fed-batch, where harvesting all but a small residue of a completed (fed) batch and leaving the remaining cells available is to use as an inoculum for the next batch

The overview below gives some more details for each type of culture feeding:

Batch processes

In a batch process, all nutrients are provided at the beginning of the cultivation, without adding any more in the subsequent bioprocess. During the entire bioprocess, no additional nutrients are added – just control elements such as gases, acids and bases; it is a closed system. The bioprocess then lasts until the nutrients are consumed. This strategy is suitable for rapid experiments such as strain characterization or the optimization of nutrient medium. The disadvantage of this convenient method is that the biomass and product yields are limited. Since the carbon source and/or oxygen transfer are usually the limiting factor, the microorganisms are not in the exponential growth phase for a long time.

To improve the availability of dissolved oxygen, the oxygen transfer rate must be increased. This is achieved by increasing the stirring speed, the gas flow, the proportion of oxygen in the gas mix, or the pressure (if the bioprocess takes place in a steel bioreactor). Since the combination of the various parameters is intended to improve the concentration, sophisticated management and control processes of these parameters are needed. These processes, known as cascades, can be configured individually to adapt them to a specific application. One or more parameters that are supposed to be used for adjusting the concentration of dissolved oxygen are predefined at the controller. The first step towards reaching the target value is to vary the first parameter (for example stirrer speed) within the defined range. If that does not work, the next step is to change subsequent parameters until the target value can be maintained.

After the end of a bioprocess run in batch mode, only the biomass or medium is harvested and appropriately processed to obtain the desired product. From the bioreactor point of view, the process is repeatedly interrupted by cleaning and sterilization steps, and the biomass is only produced in stages. In addition to the low yield of biomass, batch processes have also an increased risk for substrate or product inhibition. The latter describes the interference of enzyme activity by the presence of high concentrations of substrate or product, which might induce metabolic feedback that can drastically reduce the yield.

The advantages of a batch culture are: 

  • Short duration
  • Less chance of contamination as no nutrients are added 
  • Separation of batch material for traceability
  • Easier to manage 

Some disadvantages include 

  • Product is mixed in with nutrients, reagents, cell debris and toxins  
  • Shorter productive time  
  • Can involve storage of batches for downstream processing

 

Schematic illustration of the correlations between living cell concentration, dissolved oxygen, and the limiting carbon source in batch operation. In the initial lag phase, the living cell count only increases slowly, which leads to a moderate but steady uptake of the carbon source. Oxygen consumption increases during the exponential growth phase until it exceeds possible oxygen input. Once the carbon source is depleted, the stationary phase starts and is followed by a dead phase, during which the living cell count drastically decreases.

Fed-batch processes

One way of keeping nutrients from becoming a limiting factor is to constantly supply them during cultivation. This is called a fed-batch process, which is a partly open system. The advantage of feeding during cultivation is that it allows to overall achieve higher product quantities overall. Under specific growth conditions, the microorganisms and/or cells constantly double and therefore follow an exponential growth curve. This is why the feed rate should increase exponentially as well. Generally, the substrate is pumped from the supply bottle into the culture vessel through a silicone tube. The user can either manually set the feed at any time (linear, exponential, pulse-wise), or add nutrients when specific conditions are met,  such as when a certain biomass concentration is reached or when a nutrient is depleted.

The fed-batch process offers a wide range of control strategies and is also suitable for highly specialized applications. However, it may increase the processing time and potentially leads to inhibition through the accumulation of toxic by-products. The user also needs to have a more in-depth understanding of bioprocesses to do this, which should, however, not be interpreted as a disadvantage. 

While the batch process is classified as a discontinuous process, a fed-batch process is a semi-continuous process. During experiments at the beginning of the last century with the aim to produce as much biomass as possible from baker’s yeast in a batch process, excessively high substrate concentrations (in this case glucose) were found to inhibit growth, mainly by the formation of ethanol. On the other hand, this property of baker’s yeast can be used to produce ethanol. At high glucose concentrations and sufficient dissolved oxygen in the medium, alcoholic fermentation still occurs, which is called the Crabtree effect. This effect is used in some food production processes with yeast.

Due to their advantages, fed-batch processes per se are now used in all areas of biotechnological production, in particular for the production of recombinant proteins and antibiotics.

The advantages of a fed-batch culture are: 

  • Extends a culture’s productive duration
  • Can be used to switch genes on or off by changing substrate
  • Can be manipulated for maximum productivity using different feeding strategies

Some disadvantages include 

  • Allows build up of inhibitory agents and toxins
  • Provides another point of ingress for contamination
  • May produce high cell density numbers and product yields which are difficult to deal within downstream, creating bottlenecks in the whole process.

Schematic illustration of the relationship between the living cell concentration, dissolved oxygen, and the limiting carbon source in the fed-batch process. When implementing a fed-batch process, you will need to adding the feed immediately after the exponential phase, to prevent the carbon source from being exhausted (thick green line vs. dashed green line). Shown here is an exponential feeding process in which exponentially growing organisms remain in a prolonged exponential phase (thick gray line vs. dashed gray line). This also means that the quantity of consumed oxygen increases, which is why the amount of dissolved oxygen in the medium is lower (thick blue line vs. dashed blue line). In this example, a growth rate μ less than μmax has been selected for the feeding phase.

Continuous culture

After a batch growth phase, an equilibrium is established with respect to a particular component (also called steady state). Under these conditions, as much fresh culture medium is added, as it is removed (chemostat). These bioprocesses are referred to as continuous cultures, and are particularly suitable when an excess of nutrients would result in inhibition due to e.g. toxin build up or excessive heating. Other advantages of this method include reduced product inhibition and an improved space-time yield. When medium is removed, cells are harvested, which is why the inflow and outflow rates must be less than the doubling time of the microorganisms. Alternatively, the cells can be retained in a wide variety of ways (for example, in a spin filter), which is called perfusion. In a continuous process, the space-time yield of the bioreactor can be even further improved compared to that of a fed-batch process. However, the long cultivation period also increases the risk of contamination and long-term changes in the cultures. Moreover, continuous processes are ideal tools for gaining a better understanding of the process, since all process parameters remain constant when the system is operating correctly.

The three most common types of continuous culture are:

  • Chemostat: The rate of addition of a single growth-limiting substrate controls cell multiplication.
  • Turbidostat: An indirect measurement of cell numbers (turbidity or optical density) controls addition and removal of liquid. This needs an additional sensor but is driven by real-time feedback.
  • Perfusion: This type of continuous bioprocessing mode is based on either retaining the cells in the bioreactor or recycling the cells back to the bioreactor. Fresh medium is provided and cell-free supernatant gets removed at the same rate.

The advantages of a continuous culture are: 

  • Allows the maximum productivity
  • Time for cleaning, sterilisation and handling of the vessel are all reduced
  • Provides a steady state for metabolic studies when many elements sum to zero

Some disadvanteages include 

  • difficult to keep a constant population density over prolonged periods
  • The products of a continuous process cannot be neatly separated into batches for traceability
  • Increased risk of contamination and/or genetic changes

Repeated Fed-batch / Semi-continuous Culture

Besides fed-batch or continuous culture, there are hybrid methods that can be useful when running a bioprocess. For example, harvesting all but a small residue of a completed (fed) batch and leaving the remaining cells available to use as an inoculum for the next filling of the vessel. This feeding strategy bridges the gap between fed-batch and continuous methods and solves key issues related to using continuous culture in pharmaceutical and other production environments. This application applies to Single Cell Protein (SCP) production, as well as fermentative production of lipids, fatty acids, and penicillin.

It is a straightforward concept: after a period of batch culture, a significant part (between 25 to 75%) of the bioreactor working volume is removed and replaced with fresh media, including the carbon substrate. The remaining suspension culture in the bioreactor acts as an inoculum for the next batch. This process is repeated over several cycles, the time period being determined by the specific growth rate and substate utilization profile. Typically, after several days, the process is terminated.

Schematic illustration Repeated Fed-batch Cultivation with four different phases, starting with batch and followed by three repeated (Fed-)batch Cycle

Schematic illustration of the correlations between living cell concentration, dissolved oxygen, and the limiting carbon source in a repeated Fed-batch operation. At the end of batch cultivation, between one quarter and three quarters is harvested. The existing culture is used as inoculum for the next cycle and is supplemented with a fresh culture medium. Once the carbon source is exhausted, a new cycle can be started again by partial emptying and filling. The number of cycles is determined by the required biomass.

In a fed-batch, the feed rate is decisive to actively control the growth. In contrast, almost all repeated processes aim at substrate accumulation, which means no active influence on growth is possible. As a suitable analogy, the process can also be described as a repeated batch. Thus, different approaches with corresponding terminologies can also be found in the literature.  “Semi-continuous culture” is another alternative description.

This methodology has the following advantages over fed-batch:

  • Potential accumulation of toxins and unwanted metabolites is prevented due to the medium exchange
  • Culture density will not reach a point where issues arise due to an increase in biomass such as the oxygen transfer or cooling capacity.
  • Yields of biomass and proteins remain constant across cycles.

The benefits compared to full continuous culture are as follows:

  • The culture effluent is less diluted, reducing downstream processing requirements.
  • Allows for segregation of product into sub-batches categorized by time, which has a positive impact on quality control and troubleshooting.
  • The overall length of repeated fed-batch cultures is closer to fed-batch i.e. several days, rather than weeks or months.

Summary:  

The cultivation of organisms in a bioreactor can be manipulated in many ways. Changes in feed composition and feed rates is one of the most sensitive and productive way. The control of feed addition in modern bioreactors allows for all main categories of feeding strategies and enables precise control for the method chosen. A very rough decision-making guideline which process strategy to use is summarized below:

  • For fast, limited culture processes use batch
  • For high density, flexible productivity applications use fed-batch
  • For stable, long duration studies and controlled production in limited volumes use continuous culture

 

Do you like this post?

Leave us a rating

Average rating 4.6/5

Dejar un comentario
Thank you for your reply. We will post your comment after moderation.
Maria Leal
03.03.2024
Maria Leal

The content is very good and pictures are amazing.

nebojsa perisic
08.03.2023
nebojsa perisic

great explanation of a complex topic in human words, thanks!

Megan Allen
30.01.2023
Megan Allen

It was absolutely brilliant, a bit confusing though but the rating is very creative, love how you didnt use stars.. SLAY

Akanksha Dubey
19.08.2022
Akanksha Dubey

It's very helpful in study

Anitha Amarthaluri
19.08.2022
Anitha Amarthaluri

Easy peasy to understand...thanq

Jean-Frédéric LOUBEREAU
06.07.2022
Jean-Frédéric LOUBEREAU

Very informative to keep trace of the basics around upstream while easy to read with some fun as well: congrat

Stylin Dheera
24.05.2022
Stylin Dheera

Very useful ???and good

Adrián Alpiste
29.03.2022
Adrián Alpiste

Thanks for this accurate info, very great memories from my bachelor’s subjects!

Lorena Pedraza
15.02.2022
Lorena Pedraza

Clear and funny

Mundla Narayan reddy
16.01.2022
Mundla Narayan reddy

Very much informative

Muhammad Zulqarnain
26.12.2021
Muhammad Zulqarnain

Helpful

Uzuk Rahmanova
22.12.2021
Uzuk Rahmanova

Was easy to understand, thank you!

malyaj Malyaj
23.10.2021
malyaj Malyaj

Very helpful fundamentals. Thanks

Laura Mitrea
03.09.2021
Laura Mitrea

Thank you for the nice pics and explanations! It is very helpful!

Responder
Valentina Haag
24.09.2021
Valentina Haag

Dear Laura, thanks for letting us know - it's very helpful & valuable for us as well!

Tony Allman
26.08.2021
Tony Allman

Thanks for the kind comments. The aim of our posts is to aid understanding of the fundamental ideas behind bioprocesses. I am very happy this proved to be the case for you.

Ejike, John
26.08.2021
Ejike, John

This was just exactly what i was looking for, it gave me a summary of the fermentation process especially the chemostat and turbidostat. Kudos!!!

Leonid Dudnikov
14.08.2021
Leonid Dudnikov

very nice pictures ))), and sure, contents

Bhavitha Bairapureddy
21.07.2021
Bhavitha Bairapureddy

Very helpful

Bashir Abdullahi
19.07.2021
Bashir Abdullahi

Very good, thank you

Damiete Ogunyemi
02.07.2021
Damiete Ogunyemi

So helpful..Thanks alot

Victor Ejigah
19.04.2021
Victor Ejigah

Good stuff. Concise and straight to the point. Just what I needed

Responder
Tony Allman
19.04.2021
Tony Allman

Thanks for the kind comments.. It's always good to know when we have been able to provide the right information to be of some value to our visitors. This is great encouragement for continuing to find other topics of interest.

chandra Bhushan Badal
12.03.2021
chandra Bhushan Badal

Valuable information
Kindly we are going to install ethanol plant pls suggest which type of plant is better in process batch type or continues

Responder
Tony Allman
17.03.2021
Tony Allman

Thanks for your comments. When it comes to specific projects and applications, it needs a lot of additional information to provide meaningful; advice e.g. organism, scale, available services etc. . A firm recommendation is best coming from local experts and partners. As a general comment, I can say that the things to consider are:
Batch/Fed-batch may need larger vessels but may be simpler to handle in terms of dealing with the product/
Continuous culture will allow the use of smaller vessels but points such as possible immobilization for perfusion operation, maintaining sterility over long periods and how to handle the downstream processing of a continuous feed of product all need careful consideration.
I hope this helps.

Kiran Yadav
26.02.2021
Kiran Yadav

Nice way to explain Difference between different cultures. Specially liked the photo of Bacteria eating and enjoying the party in a culture.

Responder
Tony Allman
17.03.2021
Tony Allman

Thanks for taking the time to comment on this post. The cartoons are part of a set we use in a cookbook describing protocols for culture of commonly used organisms. You will see more examples in other posts.
Tony Allman.
INFOR-HT.

Muhammad Taher
04.11.2020
Muhammad Taher

Dear Sir,
Thank you for sharing.
Can we use this material for a textbook production.
Thank you

Responder
Chantal Fiechter Schaub
10.02.2021
Chantal Fiechter Schaub

Dear Muhammad,
Thank you for your interest. I'll contact you by mail to discuss this.
Kind regards,
Chantal